Strain template: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Genome == | == Genome == | ||
[[File: | [[File:Streptococcus bovis JB1 1 1 circos.png|center|thumb|Circos plot of ''S. azabuensis'' KH1P5. Source: Dr. William G. Alexander]] | ||
== DefenseFinder Results == | == DefenseFinder Results == | ||
== Methylome == | == Methylome == | ||
No methylation motifs were detected in ''Streptococcus bovis'' JB1. | |||
== Methylating E. coli Strains == | == Methylating E. coli Strains == | ||
No ''E. coli'' methylation strain has been constructed for ''S. bovis'' JB1 strain | |||
== Culturing Conditions == | == Culturing Conditions == | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 27 October 2026

Introduction
Streptococcus bovis JB1 was isolated from the rumen of alfalfa-fed cow. It is a major amylolytic bacterium that depolymerize starch to glucose, fermenting it to large amounts of lactic acid that can lead to lactic acidosis in ruminants.
Global Methane Hub Metadata
| Origin: | Illinois, Mackie Lab |
| Sequenced by: | Ahmed Hetta and Yuqi Li |
| Assembled by: | William G. Alexander |
| Methylome called by: | William G. Alexander |
| Methyltransferases cloned by: | No methylation motifs have been detected |
| MIC and Culturing Conditions by: | Ahmed Hetta and Yuqi Li |
| Transformation by: | Ahmed Hetta |
Genome

DefenseFinder Results
Methylome
No methylation motifs were detected in Streptococcus bovis JB1.
Methylating E. coli Strains
No E. coli methylation strain has been constructed for S. bovis JB1 strain
Culturing Conditions
S. azabuensis KH1P5 grows well in stock RCM at 37 °C. However, the inclusion of agar in commercially made RCM causes the strain to produce a thick, mucoidal layer of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) that requires removal via washing with chelating agents and detergent before work with the culture. Growing the organism in lab made RCM without agar eliminates the dense EPS layer.
KH1P5 also grows well on M2G medium at 39 °C, with 10 ml cultures reaching stationary phase after 6-7 h at optical densities of ~4-5. Cells of KH1P5 form long chains.

Antibiotic MIC Tests

| antibiotic | concentration (ug/mL) |
|---|---|
| carbenicillin | 5 |
| chloramphenicol | 0.38 |
| clarithromycin | 25 |
| erythromycin | 1 |
| kanamycin | insensitive |
| spectinomycin | 96 |
| tetracycline | 0.23 |
| thiamphenicol | 5 |
Protocols
Transformation Results
External Links
[1] Seshadri R, Leahy SC, Attwood GT, Teh KH, Lambie SC, Cookson AL, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Pavlopoulos GA, Hadjithomas M, Varghese NJ, Paez-Espino D; Hungate1000 project collaborators; Perry R, Henderson G, Creevey CJ, Terrapon N, Lapebie P, Drula E, Lombard V, Rubin E, Kyrpides NC, Henrissat B, Woyke T, Ivanova NN, Kelly WJ. 2019. Cultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection. Nature Biotechnol 36: 359-367. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4110.
[2] Kumar S, Treloar BP, Teh KH, McKenzie CM, Henderson G, Attwood GT, Waters SM, Patchett ML, Janssen PH. 2018. Sharpea and Kandleria are lactic acid producing rumen bacteria that do not change their fermentation products when co-cultured with a methanogen. Anaerobe 54: 31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.07.008.
[3] Kittelmann S, Pinares-Patiño CS, Seedorf H, Kirk MR, Ganesh S, McEwan JC, Janssen PH. 2014. Two different bacterial community types are linked with the low-methane emission trait in sheep. PLoS One 9: e103171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103171.
[4] Kamke J, Kittelmann S, Soni P, Li Y, Tavendale M, Ganesh S, Janssen PH, Shi W, Froula J, Rubin EM, Attwood GT. 2016. Rumen metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of low methane yield sheep reveals a Sharpea-enriched microbiome characterised by lactic acid formation and utilisation. Microbiome 4: 56. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0201-2.
[5] Morita H, Shiratori C, Murakami M, Takami H, Toh H, Kato Y, Nakajima F, Takagi M, Akita H, Masaoka T, Hattori M. 2008. Sharpea azabuensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-positive, strictly anaerobic bacterium isolated from the faeces of thoroughbred horses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 2682-2686 doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65543-0.
